Application Of Reply Class In Official Document Writing

< p > in previous articles, we have learned that there are three kinds of documents, such as propaganda, replies and questionnaires, in the < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > document writing < /a >. We have made a simple understanding of the publicity documents, so the second category of documents about the masses is called the reply category.

That is to say, in the face of the masses' questions or questions, candidates are asked to reply by a staff member of the government, including the reply, the response and the acceptance. The identification standard is that if the reply in the title is to answer the questions raised by the masses, it will be judged to be a reply document. For example, there is a topic in the joint examination of Tianjin and Shandong in 2010: let the candidates give a response to a reporter's reasoning by a staff member of the relevant functional departments; and, like 2012, the Henan dialect allows candidates to reply to the public's queries in the name of the National Museum, which belong to the reply category.

Then, what is the structure of the reply document presented in the form of the following, do a simple learning.

Like the publicity document, except for < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > heading < /a >, appellation, < a href= //www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > issuing organ < /a > and written time, the remaining main parts are as follows: < /p >

< p > statement: mainly thank you + statement /p.

< p > analysis link: rationality and irrationality < /p >

< p > how to do it: put forward measures < /p >

< p > ending: welcome to continue supervision work and put forward valuable opinions < /p >

< p > it can be seen that in fact, the reply document is more like a viewpoint analysis question, but the viewpoint analysis question needs the examinee to analyze, and the reply document is simply a lot here.

Note that the reply document is not the same as the publicity document at the beginning, that is, after the title and appellation, the position of this part is to express thanks to the other party's question, to thank the other side for supporting and supervising the work of the government, and to put forward his own attitude on the correctness of the other side's viewpoint.

In fact, the attitude of the candidates is more accurate than the attitude of the candidates who have come out of the application materials. The following are the reasons for your attitude, or the reasonableness and irrationality of the other's views. Generally speaking, the other side's views are put forward according to the questions. If you think that his views are incorrect, then you should put forward a correct view, that is, to solve the problem.

At the end, we simply welcome you to continue to supervise our work.

< /p >

< p > take an example of the 915 joint exam in 2012 as an example: given the opinion of two netizens in data 7, if you are a staff member of the Hanban office, please write a reply to each of the two netizens according to the given information.

(25 points) < /p >

< p > requirement: the position is correct, the content is comprehensive, the discussion is forceful, does not consider the format, does not exceed 400 words.

< /p >

< p > since the format is not considered, the title, appellation, dispatch organ and written time will not be written.

The main part is written.

The position of the main body, because it does not consider the format, can directly ignore the links of gratitude, and point out whether his views are reasonable or unreasonable. In fact, this step is similar to the point of view analysis.

Then is how to solve the problem.

< /p >

< p >, so in name, it is to test official document writing, in fact, it is a point of view analysis.

It's just a point of view.

Therefore, the examinee still needs to learn the basic questions well before drawing inferences.

< /p >