Eight, The Technology Of Rhombus Encountered &Nbsp, Was It Framed Or Something Really Happened?

The eight issue of the two technology released this year is just over.

As the news came out, the public was in an uproar and investors were very concerned about it. Did the eight chairman of science and technology really be placed on file for investigation? Did the company intentionally concealment it in the prospectus?

In November 4th, a person close to the company knew about China's capital.

Has the Nanning Public Security Bureau cancelled the case?

Eight Ling technology was first approved by the Commission in April 11th this year, but it failed to announce its failure in June because of the shortage of inquiry institutions. It became the first company to stop issuing shares in the history of A shares.

However, the eight rhombus technology chose to start again, and it will be held again in October.

In November 4th, some media said that a reporter's investigation in Nanning confirmed that Gu Yu, the real controller of eight RT technology and chairman of the company, had been put on file by the Nanning Public Security Bureau on suspicion of embezzlement.

And attached a photo of the decision of the Nanning Municipal Public Security Bureau's Economic Crime Investigation Detachment.

The media said that the above cases were eight collectively owned auto parts factories, which were collectively accused by eight staff members who were unwilling to be encroached on their shares by the eight rhomboid auto parts, the eight real technology controller and the chairman of the board of directors, Gu Yu, who used to embezzlement on behalf of his authority, deprived the rights of the shareholders of the staff and shareholders, and arranged for him to become an economic crime committed by the acting personnel, not allowed to participate in the shareholders' meetings and seek illegal income, encroach on the property of the eight shareholders of the Nanning auto parts factory and steal the shareholding of Limited by Share Ltd shareholders of the eight rhombus auto parts.

After more than two years of review by the public security organs, Gu Yu was suspected of taking office encroachment and the case was in line with the conditions of filing.

However, in November 4th, a person familiar with the matter said to China Capital Securities Network: "at present, the Nanning Public Security Bureau is looking into this matter, and the Nanning Municipal Public Security Bureau has also confirmed that Gu Yu does not have any criminal facts and has cancelled the above registration."

Eight, the shareholders of rchac are not reconciled?

"Eight the staff members of rchac think their interests are damaged, and report to all departments, and report to the Public Security Bureau.

Then spread the matter through the media's power of pmission.

The above insider's words uncovered a continuing internal dispute between the eight technology.

This dispute was buried 4 years ago.

In 2007 and 2008, at the time, for the sake of clear ownership, eight Ling technology and eight Ru auto parts had cleaned up the complicated employee contribution and share holding behavior in their history.

However, more than 200 workers and staff members finally participated in the placing of 26 people, and produced 5 million 38 thousand shares of "residual" shares.

The emergence of surplus shares is interpreted as a "premeditation" by the media.

Zhu Yanfeng, a financial commentator of Shenzhen TV station, has said that the company's pricing is reasonable, but why there will be insufficient subscriptions, which does not exclude several situations: first, employees inside the company are not optimistic about the future development of the company in the understanding of the company, and lack confidence in the company and give up the subscription.

Second, the future attribution of the company's shares has been confirmed in 2008. The internal identification of these shares has been a false move in this way, and then flowed into the pockets of major shareholders.

Third, God knows who these 5 million 40 thousand stocks are.

"All these reports have been verified by various departments and have made a clear reply.

But why do they still have to chase them? It may not be enough to meet their interests.

The people familiar with the matter said so.

Whether false statement is difficult to judge at present

The management of IPO and listing stipulates that the directors, supervisors and senior managers of the issuers shall not be investigated by the judicial organs for suspected crimes and have not yet reached a clear conclusion.

Therefore, some media pointed out that Gu Yu, as the chairman and actual controller of eight rhombus technology, has been investigated by the judiciary for investigation on suspicion of a crime, and it has become a major matter affecting the conditions of the company's public offering after the eight technology development.

The company's two issue in recent months has disclosed nothing about this risk in public disclosure, false statements, cheating investors and deliberately concealing this influence.

However, some analysts pointed out that, however, whether the eight technology or the actual controller Gu Yu is, the key is whether they have received or known the decision to make a decision on the case. If they do not know how to do so, how can they be reflected in the prospectus?